Grid Sage Forums
- April 25, 2024, 03:00:54 PM
- Welcome, Guest
|
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
51
Announcements / Re: Cogmind Expansion, Price Increase "Coming Soon"
« on: March 15, 2024, 01:02:30 AM »
Hey Baxter, up to 50 now, eh? Enough to have seen a fair amount of things, but still a lot of wild experiences out there waiting :D
I'm super eager to start sharing the meatier parts of this expansion into new areas of the world, just hope we can keep the funding going long enough to see multiple more after it!
Aside from Patreon, this project is still funded in good part by bringing in new players, so I'm quite curious if there are still enough folks out there who would be very interested in a game like this and both willing and able to support its further development at this price. We had plenty such supporters back in 2015-2016 (excellent funding before joining Steam!), but it's been a long while now...
My strong aversion to DLC makes the path harder yet, but if we can keep it up for nearly a decade as we have, adding a couple more years is not out of the question :)
I'm super eager to start sharing the meatier parts of this expansion into new areas of the world, just hope we can keep the funding going long enough to see multiple more after it!
Aside from Patreon, this project is still funded in good part by bringing in new players, so I'm quite curious if there are still enough folks out there who would be very interested in a game like this and both willing and able to support its further development at this price. We had plenty such supporters back in 2015-2016 (excellent funding before joining Steam!), but it's been a long while now...
My strong aversion to DLC makes the path harder yet, but if we can keep it up for nearly a decade as we have, adding a couple more years is not out of the question :)
52
Competitions / Re: High Scores and Stats
« on: March 12, 2024, 08:53:12 PM »
Beta 12 Stat Summary
Beta 13 is out, leaderboards have been reset, time to examine some stats from the previous version! Our last huge stat review was done after Beta 11, in 2023 here on the blog, and that being an important milestone with regard to balance, that particular review was quite extensive. This time I'll be looking at somewhat fewer categories, but it's still nice to see where certain aspects stand, especially any newer features.
Beta 12 leaderboards have been archived here, with scoresheets for all runs available here.
During Beta 12 "Encrypted Comms" (March 2023 ~ Feb 2024), 790 unique players submitted 8,592 runs that met the minimum threshold for inclusion. 296 (3.4%) of those were played in a special or challenge mode (a lower percentage than last time (8%) since no new modes were released during Beta 12), leaving us with 8,296 runs for our data analysis. (There are also many prerelease runs by patrons, but those are excluded as well, since the version is still in flux at that point.)
Wins
The overall win rate was 4.7%, so fairly middling as far as historical stats go.
Among the 7,143 Rogue-level runs (86.1%), 97 (16.5%) unique players earned at least one Beta 12 win, seemingly confirming that the increase in that metric following the Beta 11 rebalance is here to stay. Maybe it will reverse down again next time in Beta 13 with the influx of new and returning players now that we have map zooming and the new upscaled UI layouts? We'll see, but for now it looks like Beta 11 did indeed have a sizeable impact on winnability, perhaps making it a bit easier for some (?)... or our sample size is still too small to draw conclusions like this, what with different folks coming and going over the long term :P
(This is an updated graph from our Beta 11 stats--the Beta 12 prereleases would show a similar comparison, but it's not being included here.)
This time around I compiled a new category of win data people have been curious about: win types. As of Beta 10 there are 9 different win types, and according to Beta 12 records, 11 Rogue difficulty players have at some point earned every single win type at least once (there might be more who did not play Beta 12 in particular). Adding in Adventurer/Explorer runs does not change the count, which makes sense since it's generally the more hardcore players going up against every single ending (and winning).
Some other Rogue-specific win type data (remember that despite this including historical runs from earlier versions, our data is only looking at those who at least played one qualifying Beta 12 run):
Thus 32.0% of Beta 12 players have one at least one run at some point before, and 15.6% have at least two different types.
w0 is the most common, of course, and although we we can't really know how many "w0 of shame" that includes, a respectable near-half of runs are alternative wins requiring at least one late-game branch visit. Some of the win types are clearly rare, either because they're difficult to discover, or are simply really challenging (leading in many cases to a w0 instead when the primary goal was not achieved).
Among the unique winning accomplishments that aren't explicitly represented by a win type, special shoutout to Runia for being the first and only player to have successfully managed to fire the Drained L-Cannon and even use it to get an extended ++ win. Some video and summary/notes by Runia here--EXTREME EXTENDED GAME SPOILERS.
Scrap Engine
One of the main new features of Beta 12, even though not yet fully integrated plot-wise, was the already mechanically-complete easily-acquired Scrap Engine. We have a few basic stats on that.
472 runs (5.7%) used the Scrap Engine (SE) at all, and a total of 127 unique players (21.6%) tried it at least once. 71 winning runs used the SE, or 15.0% of all SE runs, most of them using it heavily as opposed to for a short time. Naturally these same folks generally created and modified greater numbers of constructs.
(Construct creation does not include modifications to existing constructs, a much greater number by around a factor of 20.)
Garrisons and DSFs
One of the other major enhancements of Beta 12 was the new Garrisons, so that probably means more Garrison visits and use of related mechanics.
18.3% of runs entered at least one Garrison in Beta 12, compared to 12.0% in Beta 11. 4.0% entered three or more (2.6% did so in Beta 11).
But continuing to follow our general RIF stats in this version, we can can see how garrison visitors were somewhat less interested in bothacking this time around, thus were clearly eager to enter Garrisons specifically to see the sights and/or acquire the other new benefits.
Speaking of new benefits, at least 1.2% of runs acquired the Encrypted Comm Array. The true number is likely higher, but it wasn't until Beta 13 that I added a way to more easily analyze that in the scoresheets, so I'm basing it purely on the number of runs in which it was actually used to rendezvous with allies (technically not a requirement to ultimately benefit).
One of our other small maps-between-maps, DSFs are also relatively new, having only been added in Beta 11. Last time I reported that 10.5% of runs visited at least one, and interestingly that level continues to hold, with 10.9% of runs visiting a DSF in Beta 12. It appears we can say with confidence that DSFs have their uses and are doing just fine--I know I've ducked into them on occasion either for fun, or to avoid trouble or get a quick build together.
Strats and Miscellany
Traps, reborn as a strong supporting strategy as of Beta 11 and gaining significant popuarity from then on, continue to enjoy the same popularity with 445 extractions by the top 20 trap users in Beta 12, compared to 428 before. The average number of traps and overall Trap Extractor use remained similar. Traps good.
Among the many uses of traps is convoy interception. 21.7% of runs that made it to -7 (lowest convoy depth) reported at least one interception. Now technically the player may not be the one who triggers it, but for some folks we can see it's quite clearly deliberate, especially those who intercept numerous convoys, and just happen to be heavy trap users, one of the most reliable ways to accomplish that task...
Notice how many of the leading convoy interceptors are also on their way to winning runs. Pure coincidence, I'm sure ;)
From the data I think everyone's come to terms with the Beta 11 fabrication overhaul and is making healthy use of the system. 35.2% of runs built at least one part, only a little lower than Beta 11, and an average of 1.38 parts were built (1.6 in Beta 11, 2.5 in Beta 10). (Note: As usual fab stats are only looking at runs that made it to at least -6.) 12.4% of runs built a robot, 0.53 on average.
20.6% of runs carried at least one Authchip, significantly higher than the 11.8% of Beta 11, and 46% of those runs used at least one of them to build something, not as high as in Beta 11 when everyone was still getting familiar with the system and how they wanted to make use of it, but significant enough to see that a good portion of players know what they want out of Authchips and are packing them in advance with a possible goal in mind.
Also with respect to Fabricators... only 4.6% of runs that reached -6 used some amount of fabnet, down from 7.9% in Beta 11 when it was introduced. And only 3 runs hit the cap (15%), down a lot since last time as well. So it does look like the previous release was more folks who wanted to try out a new feature (after even discovering it anyway--I'm sure many don't know it exists), and now it's settled down to being just another tool that might get some use in the right kind of run. MTF autooverrided the most bots in a single run with 40, and at only a 6% peak throughout, so it also helps to spread out lower numbers over a greater stretch of depths (he didn't even start until -3, then had a fabnet up for the remainder of that run which went on to an extended win).
One of the activities that's been somewhat more common in the Cogmind community lately, either as a goal in itself, or something to survive after causing too much trouble for some other reason, is sterilization. Forcing Complex 0b10 into a complete floorwide meltdown can be quite a challenge, rewarding if pulled off, and let's face it, is pretty funny when you get to walk around an empty floor with hopefully enough cooling to loot the place before being forced out :D
Surprisingly 354 runs (4.4%) sterilized at least one floor in Beta 12. Less surprisingly, none of the top 10 sterilization runs went on to win...
Despite not quite reaching the end, leiavoia did top the overall leaderboards within their epic sterilization run for the sheer score achieved by doing this, even without a win. As you can see some sterilization-oriented runs also tend to be on the longer side--it takes a while to both set up for and destroy that many bots while avoiding a swift death!
17.2% of the runs that completed two sterilizations did go on to win, however. 10.1% of the runs that only completed a single sterilization ended up winning, more than twice the overall win rate. Sterilizers are serious, 0b10.
(My own last run ended up sterilizing -3/Research in order to escape after I was blocked into a corner for plastering one too many walls with robot guts. It was a win, too, although not included in these stats because that's Beta 13...)
And finally, following up on one of Beta 11's new strategic options that I covered in more detail last time: the Exo build. Only 11 runs used Exo in Beta 12, or 0.1% of the total, compared to 82 (0.8%) in Beta 11. It was a new thing back then, so not surprising there was more uptake in the previous release. 95.2% of those which entered and survived S7 did not integrate (compared to 73.1% in Beta 11). It's usually a last resort sort of thing for most people, or something to fool around with, since it either offers less challenge, or a very different kind of challenge (it's not like everyone easily survives using it :P). I mentioned before that it might get further tweaks, but so far it seems about where I'd like it to be insofar as it serves its purpose in terms of lore, balance, and strategic options.
Beta 13 is out, leaderboards have been reset, time to examine some stats from the previous version! Our last huge stat review was done after Beta 11, in 2023 here on the blog, and that being an important milestone with regard to balance, that particular review was quite extensive. This time I'll be looking at somewhat fewer categories, but it's still nice to see where certain aspects stand, especially any newer features.
Beta 12 leaderboards have been archived here, with scoresheets for all runs available here.
During Beta 12 "Encrypted Comms" (March 2023 ~ Feb 2024), 790 unique players submitted 8,592 runs that met the minimum threshold for inclusion. 296 (3.4%) of those were played in a special or challenge mode (a lower percentage than last time (8%) since no new modes were released during Beta 12), leaving us with 8,296 runs for our data analysis. (There are also many prerelease runs by patrons, but those are excluded as well, since the version is still in flux at that point.)
Wins
The overall win rate was 4.7%, so fairly middling as far as historical stats go.
Among the 7,143 Rogue-level runs (86.1%), 97 (16.5%) unique players earned at least one Beta 12 win, seemingly confirming that the increase in that metric following the Beta 11 rebalance is here to stay. Maybe it will reverse down again next time in Beta 13 with the influx of new and returning players now that we have map zooming and the new upscaled UI layouts? We'll see, but for now it looks like Beta 11 did indeed have a sizeable impact on winnability, perhaps making it a bit easier for some (?)... or our sample size is still too small to draw conclusions like this, what with different folks coming and going over the long term :P
(This is an updated graph from our Beta 11 stats--the Beta 12 prereleases would show a similar comparison, but it's not being included here.)
This time around I compiled a new category of win data people have been curious about: win types. As of Beta 10 there are 9 different win types, and according to Beta 12 records, 11 Rogue difficulty players have at some point earned every single win type at least once (there might be more who did not play Beta 12 in particular). Adding in Adventurer/Explorer runs does not change the count, which makes sense since it's generally the more hardcore players going up against every single ending (and winning).
Some other Rogue-specific win type data (remember that despite this including historical runs from earlier versions, our data is only looking at those who at least played one qualifying Beta 12 run):
Thus 32.0% of Beta 12 players have one at least one run at some point before, and 15.6% have at least two different types.
w0 is the most common, of course, and although we we can't really know how many "w0 of shame" that includes, a respectable near-half of runs are alternative wins requiring at least one late-game branch visit. Some of the win types are clearly rare, either because they're difficult to discover, or are simply really challenging (leading in many cases to a w0 instead when the primary goal was not achieved).
Among the unique winning accomplishments that aren't explicitly represented by a win type, special shoutout to Runia for being the first and only player to have successfully managed to fire the Drained L-Cannon and even use it to get an extended ++ win. Some video and summary/notes by Runia here--EXTREME EXTENDED GAME SPOILERS.
Scrap Engine
One of the main new features of Beta 12, even though not yet fully integrated plot-wise, was the already mechanically-complete easily-acquired Scrap Engine. We have a few basic stats on that.
472 runs (5.7%) used the Scrap Engine (SE) at all, and a total of 127 unique players (21.6%) tried it at least once. 71 winning runs used the SE, or 15.0% of all SE runs, most of them using it heavily as opposed to for a short time. Naturally these same folks generally created and modified greater numbers of constructs.
(Construct creation does not include modifications to existing constructs, a much greater number by around a factor of 20.)
Garrisons and DSFs
One of the other major enhancements of Beta 12 was the new Garrisons, so that probably means more Garrison visits and use of related mechanics.
18.3% of runs entered at least one Garrison in Beta 12, compared to 12.0% in Beta 11. 4.0% entered three or more (2.6% did so in Beta 11).
But continuing to follow our general RIF stats in this version, we can can see how garrison visitors were somewhat less interested in bothacking this time around, thus were clearly eager to enter Garrisons specifically to see the sights and/or acquire the other new benefits.
Speaking of new benefits, at least 1.2% of runs acquired the Encrypted Comm Array. The true number is likely higher, but it wasn't until Beta 13 that I added a way to more easily analyze that in the scoresheets, so I'm basing it purely on the number of runs in which it was actually used to rendezvous with allies (technically not a requirement to ultimately benefit).
One of our other small maps-between-maps, DSFs are also relatively new, having only been added in Beta 11. Last time I reported that 10.5% of runs visited at least one, and interestingly that level continues to hold, with 10.9% of runs visiting a DSF in Beta 12. It appears we can say with confidence that DSFs have their uses and are doing just fine--I know I've ducked into them on occasion either for fun, or to avoid trouble or get a quick build together.
Strats and Miscellany
Traps, reborn as a strong supporting strategy as of Beta 11 and gaining significant popuarity from then on, continue to enjoy the same popularity with 445 extractions by the top 20 trap users in Beta 12, compared to 428 before. The average number of traps and overall Trap Extractor use remained similar. Traps good.
Among the many uses of traps is convoy interception. 21.7% of runs that made it to -7 (lowest convoy depth) reported at least one interception. Now technically the player may not be the one who triggers it, but for some folks we can see it's quite clearly deliberate, especially those who intercept numerous convoys, and just happen to be heavy trap users, one of the most reliable ways to accomplish that task...
Notice how many of the leading convoy interceptors are also on their way to winning runs. Pure coincidence, I'm sure ;)
From the data I think everyone's come to terms with the Beta 11 fabrication overhaul and is making healthy use of the system. 35.2% of runs built at least one part, only a little lower than Beta 11, and an average of 1.38 parts were built (1.6 in Beta 11, 2.5 in Beta 10). (Note: As usual fab stats are only looking at runs that made it to at least -6.) 12.4% of runs built a robot, 0.53 on average.
20.6% of runs carried at least one Authchip, significantly higher than the 11.8% of Beta 11, and 46% of those runs used at least one of them to build something, not as high as in Beta 11 when everyone was still getting familiar with the system and how they wanted to make use of it, but significant enough to see that a good portion of players know what they want out of Authchips and are packing them in advance with a possible goal in mind.
Also with respect to Fabricators... only 4.6% of runs that reached -6 used some amount of fabnet, down from 7.9% in Beta 11 when it was introduced. And only 3 runs hit the cap (15%), down a lot since last time as well. So it does look like the previous release was more folks who wanted to try out a new feature (after even discovering it anyway--I'm sure many don't know it exists), and now it's settled down to being just another tool that might get some use in the right kind of run. MTF autooverrided the most bots in a single run with 40, and at only a 6% peak throughout, so it also helps to spread out lower numbers over a greater stretch of depths (he didn't even start until -3, then had a fabnet up for the remainder of that run which went on to an extended win).
One of the activities that's been somewhat more common in the Cogmind community lately, either as a goal in itself, or something to survive after causing too much trouble for some other reason, is sterilization. Forcing Complex 0b10 into a complete floorwide meltdown can be quite a challenge, rewarding if pulled off, and let's face it, is pretty funny when you get to walk around an empty floor with hopefully enough cooling to loot the place before being forced out :D
Surprisingly 354 runs (4.4%) sterilized at least one floor in Beta 12. Less surprisingly, none of the top 10 sterilization runs went on to win...
Despite not quite reaching the end, leiavoia did top the overall leaderboards within their epic sterilization run for the sheer score achieved by doing this, even without a win. As you can see some sterilization-oriented runs also tend to be on the longer side--it takes a while to both set up for and destroy that many bots while avoiding a swift death!
17.2% of the runs that completed two sterilizations did go on to win, however. 10.1% of the runs that only completed a single sterilization ended up winning, more than twice the overall win rate. Sterilizers are serious, 0b10.
(My own last run ended up sterilizing -3/Research in order to escape after I was blocked into a corner for plastering one too many walls with robot guts. It was a win, too, although not included in these stats because that's Beta 13...)
And finally, following up on one of Beta 11's new strategic options that I covered in more detail last time: the Exo build. Only 11 runs used Exo in Beta 12, or 0.1% of the total, compared to 82 (0.8%) in Beta 11. It was a new thing back then, so not surprising there was more uptake in the previous release. 95.2% of those which entered and survived S7 did not integrate (compared to 73.1% in Beta 11). It's usually a last resort sort of thing for most people, or something to fool around with, since it either offers less challenge, or a very different kind of challenge (it's not like everyone easily survives using it :P). I mentioned before that it might get further tweaks, but so far it seems about where I'd like it to be insofar as it serves its purpose in terms of lore, balance, and strategic options.
53
Announcements / Cogmind Expansion, Price Increase "Coming Soon"
« on: March 10, 2024, 09:49:25 PM »
It's finally time! For 1.0? No, of course not (that we hit it back in 2017 is just a poorly kept secret), what I mean is raising the price to better reflect what Cogmind is: hundreds of hours of content and lovingly-crafted roguelike adventure and storytelling. I don't explicitly advertise the worldbuilding's diversity and surprises, since that is best left to discovery, but it's been enough to challenge and entertain some folks for even thousands of hours. (Cogmind's screenshots represent only a small fraction of what you'll really find out there, for the reality you'd have to check out spoiler sections of the community, or some videos/streams.)
And the scope continues to grow.
I've dedicated more than the past decade of my life to full-time development of Cogmind. Just me, since it's not like this could support additional folks--it can only barely cover frugal old me :P. I will hopefully, likely, continue to do so for the next couple years. Content is planned out even beyond that, but who knows if it will still be sustainable by then?
That said, as stated before I've never wanted to declare 1.0 then release all my expansions as DLC. Even though that technically makes a lot of business sense and would be significantly more sustainable, I think it leads to a worse player and community experience overall. Instead, I chose to start a Patreon some years ago to help keep the lights on. Although paling in comparison to what DLC would bring in, that has worked out well enough, so once again a special thanks to all of you patrons!
To the point at hand, Cogmind's price will be going up next month. There's only a relatively small window within which to do this without conflicting with other Steam events, and that period is April, so April it is. The new base price will be set to $24.99, and no don't expect that to mean deeper discounts going forward. The price isn't being raised to allow for greater discounts, it's being raised simply to raise the price :P
Some may question the idea of a price increase during "Early Access," but don't worry, the price will likely go up again (!) later and Cogmind isn't really Early Access, anyway, we're waaaay past that. Yes that label does keep some people from buying in since they're skeptical of anything marked EA, an unfortunate side effect of all the poorly planned or executed projects that don't manage it well. Cogmind could've completely skipped Early Access to begin with, or stop development at any point, and be fine in terms of completion.* (Cogmind was publicly released for over two years before coming to Steam in the first place! The date on the Steam page is not Cogmind's actual release date, though many informational sites will assume and repeat that...) We'll open the gates to those folks eventually, but the next couple themed expansions cover at least four more betas before that's even a consideration. The third still-to-come major expansion could be released before or after that threshold (still undecided), it's essentially just a pure marketing decision when to use the "1.0" label.
*that said, I'm super happy, as I'm sure others are, that we've finally been in development long enough, with enough new QoL and engine features, to support map zooming and full UI upscaling--that was BIG
Some historical metrics, for context:
For more historical info and graphs, you can also check out my annual reviews, one from each year for the past 10 years so far.
As for the next expansion, to focus on an important new location, it has technically already begun in part as a portion of Beta 13, and much more than that was completed last year, but that version detoured off into the map zoom and UI upscaling features arena so that more people could join us on this ongoing journey. With all of the new folks on board now, it's time to get this train steaming into exciting new territory again.
We're soon to increase the number of items in Cogmind by nearly 7%, a nice chunk considering we're already over 1,000, along with new maps, new factions, new abilities, yet another large increase in the number of encounters... the works. It'll be like Cogmind alpha content injections all over again, said in the strongest attempting-to-contain-my-hype tone possible :)
So yeah, in summary, price going up next month, and fun new releases coming, too, but... those not quite next month :P. They won't take forever, though--we'll be seeing somewhat faster releases down the line!
Oh yeah and there's still one more discount coming up later this week, so before the increase in price.
Memestrike
Since even after using an abbreviated version of the Beta 13 release notes we still hit Steam's length limit, I didn't have a chance to append any community stuff to our last announcement, so I'll just do that here...
MrMesh shared this wicked painting of a Cogmind scene--such a lively piece that also captures some great details! (via Roguelikes/Cogmind Discord)
A pair of awesome meme videos also dropped recently, including one titled "The Cogmind Beta 13 Experience" by Youngster (not very spoilery, but fun and nicely done!) and another dubbed "Cogmind Slander" by u/dogawesome, which is a good summary of a lot of Cogmind experiences, and in that sense it contains a lot of spoilers, but probably makes relatively little sense to anyone who hasn't actually played, or moreover played a lot. There's a huge number of lore and content references in there though, for those who can relate ;)
After releasing some patches for Beta 13, I also streamed the late-game portion of a run I had started on my own. It was fairly chaotic as usual, by choice :)
Some map-wide sterilization may have occurred prior to the start of the stream, and we know that in Cogmind destruction often begets ever greater levels of destruction, so yeah, continued remodeling was in the cards for a while.
We later used a hidden spoiler area to switch to 100% stealth for the remainder of the run (okay, except for the times our friends murdered everyone...)
That run was able to temporarily take 6th place since the leaderboards were reset for Beta 13, but has already been pushed down to 10th as more folks finish up their first runs with the new version, and at only 64k will probably not even sit within the top 20 for too long :P
And the scope continues to grow.
I've dedicated more than the past decade of my life to full-time development of Cogmind. Just me, since it's not like this could support additional folks--it can only barely cover frugal old me :P. I will hopefully, likely, continue to do so for the next couple years. Content is planned out even beyond that, but who knows if it will still be sustainable by then?
That said, as stated before I've never wanted to declare 1.0 then release all my expansions as DLC. Even though that technically makes a lot of business sense and would be significantly more sustainable, I think it leads to a worse player and community experience overall. Instead, I chose to start a Patreon some years ago to help keep the lights on. Although paling in comparison to what DLC would bring in, that has worked out well enough, so once again a special thanks to all of you patrons!
To the point at hand, Cogmind's price will be going up next month. There's only a relatively small window within which to do this without conflicting with other Steam events, and that period is April, so April it is. The new base price will be set to $24.99, and no don't expect that to mean deeper discounts going forward. The price isn't being raised to allow for greater discounts, it's being raised simply to raise the price :P
Some may question the idea of a price increase during "Early Access," but don't worry, the price will likely go up again (!) later and Cogmind isn't really Early Access, anyway, we're waaaay past that. Yes that label does keep some people from buying in since they're skeptical of anything marked EA, an unfortunate side effect of all the poorly planned or executed projects that don't manage it well. Cogmind could've completely skipped Early Access to begin with, or stop development at any point, and be fine in terms of completion.* (Cogmind was publicly released for over two years before coming to Steam in the first place! The date on the Steam page is not Cogmind's actual release date, though many informational sites will assume and repeat that...) We'll open the gates to those folks eventually, but the next couple themed expansions cover at least four more betas before that's even a consideration. The third still-to-come major expansion could be released before or after that threshold (still undecided), it's essentially just a pure marketing decision when to use the "1.0" label.
*that said, I'm super happy, as I'm sure others are, that we've finally been in development long enough, with enough new QoL and engine features, to support map zooming and full UI upscaling--that was BIG
Some historical metrics, for context:
For more historical info and graphs, you can also check out my annual reviews, one from each year for the past 10 years so far.
As for the next expansion, to focus on an important new location, it has technically already begun in part as a portion of Beta 13, and much more than that was completed last year, but that version detoured off into the map zoom and UI upscaling features arena so that more people could join us on this ongoing journey. With all of the new folks on board now, it's time to get this train steaming into exciting new territory again.
We're soon to increase the number of items in Cogmind by nearly 7%, a nice chunk considering we're already over 1,000, along with new maps, new factions, new abilities, yet another large increase in the number of encounters... the works. It'll be like Cogmind alpha content injections all over again, said in the strongest attempting-to-contain-my-hype tone possible :)
So yeah, in summary, price going up next month, and fun new releases coming, too, but... those not quite next month :P. They won't take forever, though--we'll be seeing somewhat faster releases down the line!
Oh yeah and there's still one more discount coming up later this week, so before the increase in price.
Memestrike
Since even after using an abbreviated version of the Beta 13 release notes we still hit Steam's length limit, I didn't have a chance to append any community stuff to our last announcement, so I'll just do that here...
MrMesh shared this wicked painting of a Cogmind scene--such a lively piece that also captures some great details! (via Roguelikes/Cogmind Discord)
A pair of awesome meme videos also dropped recently, including one titled "The Cogmind Beta 13 Experience" by Youngster (not very spoilery, but fun and nicely done!) and another dubbed "Cogmind Slander" by u/dogawesome, which is a good summary of a lot of Cogmind experiences, and in that sense it contains a lot of spoilers, but probably makes relatively little sense to anyone who hasn't actually played, or moreover played a lot. There's a huge number of lore and content references in there though, for those who can relate ;)
After releasing some patches for Beta 13, I also streamed the late-game portion of a run I had started on my own. It was fairly chaotic as usual, by choice :)
Some map-wide sterilization may have occurred prior to the start of the stream, and we know that in Cogmind destruction often begets ever greater levels of destruction, so yeah, continued remodeling was in the cards for a while.
We later used a hidden spoiler area to switch to 100% stealth for the remainder of the run (okay, except for the times our friends murdered everyone...)
That run was able to temporarily take 6th place since the leaderboards were reset for Beta 13, but has already been pushed down to 10th as more folks finish up their first runs with the new version, and at only 64k will probably not even sit within the top 20 for too long :P
54
Announcements / Re: Cogmind Beta 13 "Zoom All The Things"
« on: March 04, 2024, 07:53:37 AM »
More QoL and fixes!
Nothing major in here, just cleaning up some of the new features and addressing a handful of small issues, but definitely worth the update if you've been playing the new Beta 13! (it's another automatic update on Steam, just mentioning for the DRM-free folks)
As a minor patch, existing Beta 13 saves/runs in progress are fully compatible.
Cogmind Beta 13 patch 240304 changelog:
Among the new features we have a new advanced.cfg option for those of you who play more overweight builds and want to do a little less mathing: showOverweightMassThresholdRemainder. Setting that will change your overweight indicator from the simple Ox# format to the more esoteric X%Y. This will both make you cooler and also let you know that you've exceeded your mass support X times over and have a surplus of Y mass remaining before you hit the next threshold and get even slower :P (think of that % in there as conceptually like a modulo)
Here you can see it in operation:
While most mouse users scroll the inventory with the wheel, those buttons at the bottom/top of a larger inventory technically also scroll the contents, but in the past only did so one at a time. Those now serve as near page-wise scrolling buttons, which may be more convenient for those who actually want to use them:
For a while now it's bugged me that there seemed to be some issue with completely resetting the subcategory part label system, and sure enough there was! Pressing Escape will now truly and completely reset it, which not many probably noticed before, but there'd be a short duration during which it could affect whether pure keyboard players could access the extended combat log with the '-' key after having recently used the categorical labels. If you have no idea what I'm talking about, it's the fact that you can specify that you only want to see map labels for certain types of parts by cycling through them, for example only power sources, or propulsion, or matter, etc., instead of everything, which after a big battle can obviously get a little cramped!
(You get these via Tab/Shift-Tab or -/= while showing item labels.)
Tomorrow I'll be doing some Beta 13 streaming of this latest build, but not starting from scratch! We'll pick up in the late game where I left off in a run a started on my own a few days back, after having sterilized a Research map and lucking into a VL-GR5 encounter which is about to start. (Ended up spending a huge amount of time the past few days working on the game again, including some reported issues and also a bunch of these patch contents I listed out while doing my run, so never got a chance to finish it xD)
Update: Stream/run completed, here's the results :)
Nothing major in here, just cleaning up some of the new features and addressing a handful of small issues, but definitely worth the update if you've been playing the new Beta 13! (it's another automatic update on Steam, just mentioning for the DRM-free folks)
As a minor patch, existing Beta 13 saves/runs in progress are fully compatible.
Cogmind Beta 13 patch 240304 changelog:
- NEW: 1 new encounter variant
- NEW: Added more cases of machine hacking shell directly confirming content of meta intel originally shown in message log
- NEW: Using '-' key in Modal UI layout automatically switches to combat log mode and scrolls it open even if not already in that mode
- NEW: Position of window in Windowed mode remains constant during game over screens and font changes
- NEW: Option to calculate and display available mass support before reaching next overweight threshold (advanced.cfg: showOverweightMassThresholdRemainder)
- MOD: Plasma Cutter's new effect description updated to explicitly indicate it works on blast doors
- MOD: Cobblers start producing components earlier
- MOD: LMB on inventory scrolling buttons scrolls by page instead of one at a time
- MOD: Custom reduced fullscreen dimensions remain within specified limits rather than trying to fill display during game over screens
- FIX: System Guards silently retained some old pre-Beta 12 functionality [CaptainWinky]
- FIX: Salvaged Cobbler Units could have unusual counter values when first used [CaptainWinky]
- FIX: Unique new build type classification applied under too few circumstances [CaptainWinky]
- FIX: New layout architecture caused custom window heights greater than default to revert to default for duration of game over screens [Vormithrax]
- FIX: New special item dropped under wrong circumstances during particular NPC encounter [doshdoshington, Runia, aoemica]
- FIX: Pressing ESC erased active item labels and reset filter type without restoring other input functions to overlapping controls (-/=) until normal expiry
- FIX: Under some layouts and circumstances, world map info window close button may not highlight while cursor hovering
- FIX: Item info window in 45-row UI layouts did not correctly place corner brackets for handful of parts with "No Image Data"
- FIX: [Polymind mode] Taking a Cobbler host resulted in zero matter capacity
Among the new features we have a new advanced.cfg option for those of you who play more overweight builds and want to do a little less mathing: showOverweightMassThresholdRemainder. Setting that will change your overweight indicator from the simple Ox# format to the more esoteric X%Y. This will both make you cooler and also let you know that you've exceeded your mass support X times over and have a surplus of Y mass remaining before you hit the next threshold and get even slower :P (think of that % in there as conceptually like a modulo)
Here you can see it in operation:
While most mouse users scroll the inventory with the wheel, those buttons at the bottom/top of a larger inventory technically also scroll the contents, but in the past only did so one at a time. Those now serve as near page-wise scrolling buttons, which may be more convenient for those who actually want to use them:
For a while now it's bugged me that there seemed to be some issue with completely resetting the subcategory part label system, and sure enough there was! Pressing Escape will now truly and completely reset it, which not many probably noticed before, but there'd be a short duration during which it could affect whether pure keyboard players could access the extended combat log with the '-' key after having recently used the categorical labels. If you have no idea what I'm talking about, it's the fact that you can specify that you only want to see map labels for certain types of parts by cycling through them, for example only power sources, or propulsion, or matter, etc., instead of everything, which after a big battle can obviously get a little cramped!
(You get these via Tab/Shift-Tab or -/= while showing item labels.)
Tomorrow I'll be doing some Beta 13 streaming of this latest build, but not starting from scratch! We'll pick up in the late game where I left off in a run a started on my own a few days back, after having sterilized a Research map and lucking into a VL-GR5 encounter which is about to start. (Ended up spending a huge amount of time the past few days working on the game again, including some reported issues and also a bunch of these patch contents I listed out while doing my run, so never got a chance to finish it xD)
Update: Stream/run completed, here's the results :)
55
Strategies / Re: Strategy: getting past the Beast
« on: March 03, 2024, 06:08:28 PM »
Heh, that indeed is the easiest way to go for your first win 
Just don't create the potential for Cutters on the way and you're golden!
Just don't create the potential for Cutters on the way and you're golden!
56
Strategies / Re: Strategy: getting past the Beast
« on: March 03, 2024, 12:39:14 AM »I've also joined the Discord.Yeah I saw your name pop up there on the list and figured that was you
(you'll have to read the rules FAQ when you get a chance to enter the code for access, tons of people and lots of roguelikes plus Cogmind stuff inside 
)Those scoresheets are a thing of beauty, btw. Very helpful.\o/
Dataminer is very cool, too, with links to graphs of a lot of the scoresheet data etc, and comparisons to community stats as well.
57
Strategies / Re: Strategy: getting past the Beast
« on: March 02, 2024, 10:10:03 PM »
By the way you tend to be playing/posting when I'm asleep, so I can't really give any timely responses here, but around that time there are plenty of pros on the Discord server who love to look at screenshots and give realtime advice!
58
Strategies / Re: Strategy: getting past the Beast
« on: March 02, 2024, 10:08:07 PM »
Excellent, so you did have a launcher and use that to create a loop to lure the Behemoth around. Good job :)
Saw your sheet, overall a pretty good job for having started only recently!
Switching to flight requires a pretty different mentality, but actually it does look like you were pretty ready to do so! Certainly the easiest way to get your first win. Fighting to the top in a slower build is generally more challenging.
Matter is very important to keep an eye on, pay attention to those warnings. Or better yet, plan in advance and have lots of extra or methods to acquire more. Your status in the sheet does show at that point you were basically running on empty :)
Fortunately you had a Proton cannon though, so could just shoot up some green bots, and in particular lure in some Recyclers and blast those to get back to full, hopefully before any other encounters. (You having just dropped into the map there, that would've been a good start, since as a non-branch the area would be safe so "summon" some Recyclers to top up) :P
Saw your sheet, overall a pretty good job for having started only recently!
Switching to flight requires a pretty different mentality, but actually it does look like you were pretty ready to do so! Certainly the easiest way to get your first win. Fighting to the top in a slower build is generally more challenging.
Matter is very important to keep an eye on, pay attention to those warnings. Or better yet, plan in advance and have lots of extra or methods to acquire more. Your status in the sheet does show at that point you were basically running on empty :)
Fortunately you had a Proton cannon though, so could just shoot up some green bots, and in particular lure in some Recyclers and blast those to get back to full, hopefully before any other encounters. (You having just dropped into the map there, that would've been a good start, since as a non-branch the area would be safe so "summon" some Recyclers to top up) :P
59
Strategies / Re: Strategy: getting past the Beast
« on: March 02, 2024, 01:17:09 AM »
Welcome, Baxter! And you're very welcome :)
Circumventing Behemoths in the caves is super common, the most common method being digging, yep.
You pretty much never have to face them head on, it's just a question of how you're going to get by either without being noticed, or taking minimal damage. (Unless you've got lots of friends, or serious firepower and aren't afraid of them, but unless there's no choice or they've got something you want, may as well skip the unnecessary attrition!)
With respect to digging, I would strongly suggest going further! It's very likely you can get around that way here, though in some cases you may have to rush through a 4~5-cell deep tunnel you dig out.
Ideally in the caves you've brought along something that can safely dig from a distance (like a cannon! preferably a thermal one), though I can't see the bottom of your inventory where such a thing would be if you had one. Clearly digging your way through with an Axe is going to be a bit more dangerous :P. If you had some terrain intel you could also better tell whether it's worth it--Terrain Scanners and Structural Scanners are both very useful.
I can't quite see the greater layout of the map to help make a determination here, but either way I'd definitely get closer to that Behemoth down the main corridor there to see what's off to it's other side. You won't attract its attention if you hug the wall, though yeah at some point they're gonna spot you ;)
Luring and going around is also a common tactic if you have to get shot at (as is just running past at top speed, but you're not super fast and we can't see how many obstacles there are on the other side), but unfortunately there is no good lure path here.
You could probably do okay by removing your sensors and plating and slapping on your heavy armor (which would keep you underweight and fast enough) and just run by for cover on the other side--it's only going to get so many shots off and your armor will eat it, though I'd worry you lose a couple legs and that might become a problem. The other danger there is if there is something else dangerous beyond the Behemoth, because then you'd be really in trouble! Such is the danger of fleeing into the unknown in roguelikes ;)
Also I can't tell if you have explosives down in your inventory (hopefully you carry a launcher at all time if possible!), but if you do, totally use that to do more digging around above the Behemoth, or maybe other directions I can't tell from the image.
Anyway, there is my thesis on this particular Behemoth xD
Circumventing Behemoths in the caves is super common, the most common method being digging, yep.
You pretty much never have to face them head on, it's just a question of how you're going to get by either without being noticed, or taking minimal damage. (Unless you've got lots of friends, or serious firepower and aren't afraid of them, but unless there's no choice or they've got something you want, may as well skip the unnecessary attrition!)
With respect to digging, I would strongly suggest going further! It's very likely you can get around that way here, though in some cases you may have to rush through a 4~5-cell deep tunnel you dig out.
Ideally in the caves you've brought along something that can safely dig from a distance (like a cannon! preferably a thermal one), though I can't see the bottom of your inventory where such a thing would be if you had one. Clearly digging your way through with an Axe is going to be a bit more dangerous :P. If you had some terrain intel you could also better tell whether it's worth it--Terrain Scanners and Structural Scanners are both very useful.
I can't quite see the greater layout of the map to help make a determination here, but either way I'd definitely get closer to that Behemoth down the main corridor there to see what's off to it's other side. You won't attract its attention if you hug the wall, though yeah at some point they're gonna spot you ;)
Luring and going around is also a common tactic if you have to get shot at (as is just running past at top speed, but you're not super fast and we can't see how many obstacles there are on the other side), but unfortunately there is no good lure path here.
You could probably do okay by removing your sensors and plating and slapping on your heavy armor (which would keep you underweight and fast enough) and just run by for cover on the other side--it's only going to get so many shots off and your armor will eat it, though I'd worry you lose a couple legs and that might become a problem. The other danger there is if there is something else dangerous beyond the Behemoth, because then you'd be really in trouble! Such is the danger of fleeing into the unknown in roguelikes ;)
Also I can't tell if you have explosives down in your inventory (hopefully you carry a launcher at all time if possible!), but if you do, totally use that to do more digging around above the Behemoth, or maybe other directions I can't tell from the image.
Anyway, there is my thesis on this particular Behemoth xD
60
Announcements / Re: Cogmind Beta 13 "Zoom All The Things"
« on: February 28, 2024, 10:59:35 AM »
Mini-patch time!
There were a few little QoL things I really wanted to get out the door for Beta 13 right before release day, but despite working into the wee hours of the morning, there wasn't quite enough time... So instead I've worked into the wee hours of the morning on the second day to finish up an early patch xD
Alongside some new features comes a handful of early fixes as well, as mentioned before quite expected considering such massive changes throughout the architecture to make Beta 13 and its map zooming/alternate layouts features possible. So far the release seems to be going quite well though, I'm happy with it and will continue to provide some near-term patches if necessary.
As a minor patch, existing Beta 13 saves/runs in progress are fully compatible, so nothing to worry about there...
Cogmind Beta 13 patch 240229 changelog:
Here you can see our new popup notification in action. I know not everyone will notice the descriptions mentioning restart on a few of the options that require it to take effect, so this will help reinforce that.
We've got some new bots capable of taking advantage of the relatively new capability of moving through so-called "twisted machinery," and since they appear so early in the world, at the time you may not have weapons strong enough to actually hit or hurt them (or realize you need to use them) while they're hiding in said machinery, but you also can't see it since they're obscuring it... so now we've got cause to blink them in this particular situation:
The blinking effect doesn't start until a few seconds after they've come into sight or entered your current map view, in case there is other more important status info you need to know, like whether they've spotted you or not, but otherwise they'll keep doing that while it's relevant.
Today I finally bit the bullet and put more "meta" (non-direct terminal shell info) directly in the shell output when machine hacking. This is especially for modal layout users, who can't simultaneously see the message log where this information normally appears. Here's an example of getting an ALERT message mirrored inside the shell:
A number of other message types can appear there as well, including perhaps most importantly any time you prelearn data about future maps! Also applies to hacking feedback effects, and this new look was also extended to our original advanced.cfg botnet notice.
Here's another example with mirrored intel acquisition:
That'll be it for this patch.
In other news, the leaderboards should be reset tomorrow (from their current Beta 12 state) as enough new runs have started coming in to populate it.
Update: Leaderboards reset! So not-green!
There were a few little QoL things I really wanted to get out the door for Beta 13 right before release day, but despite working into the wee hours of the morning, there wasn't quite enough time... So instead I've worked into the wee hours of the morning on the second day to finish up an early patch xD
Alongside some new features comes a handful of early fixes as well, as mentioned before quite expected considering such massive changes throughout the architecture to make Beta 13 and its map zooming/alternate layouts features possible. So far the release seems to be going quite well though, I'm happy with it and will continue to provide some near-term patches if necessary.
As a minor patch, existing Beta 13 saves/runs in progress are fully compatible, so nothing to worry about there...
Cogmind Beta 13 patch 240229 changelog:
- NEW: Popup notification for Options menu settings that require restart/new run to take effect
- NEW: Some meta info and events obtained via Terminal access normally visible in Non-modal UI layout message log now available in all layouts via Shell
- NEW: Subdwellers and Zionites currently positioned in Twisted Machinery will start blinking out to reveal and emphasize that situation
- FIX: Entering examine mode while Cogmind not in view could in some orientations cause temporary cursor positioning issues [biznut, darkwing_terror]
- FIX: Options menu list popups could stretch beyond bottom window edge in new modal layouts [zxc]
- FIX: New world route became unintended way to acquire certain hidden achievement [KillTheWhales]
- FIX: New crash on accessing Security Stations hack on Garrison interior Terminal due to hotfix patch [dr.hermelin]
- FIX: Relative Vulnerability visualization temporary name indicator partially obscured in modal layouts
Here you can see our new popup notification in action. I know not everyone will notice the descriptions mentioning restart on a few of the options that require it to take effect, so this will help reinforce that.
We've got some new bots capable of taking advantage of the relatively new capability of moving through so-called "twisted machinery," and since they appear so early in the world, at the time you may not have weapons strong enough to actually hit or hurt them (or realize you need to use them) while they're hiding in said machinery, but you also can't see it since they're obscuring it... so now we've got cause to blink them in this particular situation:
The blinking effect doesn't start until a few seconds after they've come into sight or entered your current map view, in case there is other more important status info you need to know, like whether they've spotted you or not, but otherwise they'll keep doing that while it's relevant.
Today I finally bit the bullet and put more "meta" (non-direct terminal shell info) directly in the shell output when machine hacking. This is especially for modal layout users, who can't simultaneously see the message log where this information normally appears. Here's an example of getting an ALERT message mirrored inside the shell:
A number of other message types can appear there as well, including perhaps most importantly any time you prelearn data about future maps! Also applies to hacking feedback effects, and this new look was also extended to our original advanced.cfg botnet notice.
Here's another example with mirrored intel acquisition:
That'll be it for this patch.
In other news, the leaderboards should be reset tomorrow (from their current Beta 12 state) as enough new runs have started coming in to populate it.
Update: Leaderboards reset! So not-green!
61
Announcements / Cogmind Beta 13 "Zoom All The Things"
« on: February 26, 2024, 05:39:10 PM »
WARNING: Upscaled and zoomable Cogmind has landed :D
Beta 13 is here, and with it comes larger text and the ability to double the map tile size on the fly, including a huge range of supporting QoL features. Yeah there's a new map, new items and some new bots, but our primary focus today is expanding the range of displays suitable for playing Cogmind, and one way to achieve that is to provide multiple new UI layouts capable of squeezing the terminal data from 60 rows down to 45.
Before examining the sizeable changelog as a whole, let's jump right in with demos of our main features!
Everything Gets Bigger
Cogmind's original full-size layout is still a thing, now dubbed the "Non-modal" UI layout in the Options menu, and it is in this layout that the new map zoom feature is likely the most useful, as you can see here:
That particular image happens to be 1440p, but if you fullscreen it on another resolution (for example 1080p) you'll ultimately get the same effect. (Many layout images in this announcement can be opened to their much larger form.)
But for those of you who really want everything to get bigger, and a new default going forward, we have the new "Semi-modal" UI layout (1080p sample below, see also 1440p and 2160p):
And yep, if you want to you can also even zoom the map in a modal layout, resulting in this (another 1080p sample, here using one of several new fonts: Tamsyn):
Of course, as you can see reducing the number of rows in our terminal also meant shrinking our map view, to which the answer is our third UI layout option: "Modal," in order to see more map by hiding some windows (1080p below, see also 1440p and 2160p):
Also whenever you want it there's "Modal" zoomed, if you must :)
That should give you a pretty good overview of the new sizing options possible in Beta 13, and you'll also find yet more new font styles to choose from, including some typefaces at sizes they were not previously available at. Support is included all the way up to 5K resolutions.
But there's a lot more to Beta 13, as you'll see below...
Subcaves
Let's take a break from the interface for a moment to highlight the fact that Beta 13 adds a new map! And it's down really really low! That means it's accessible, right? Well, in a sense :P
The so-called "Subcaves" are not recommended carefree adventuring territory, and anyone who isn't aware of this area's existence may not even discover it for a little while, since it's slightly hidden away for that reason (also for lore reasons).
The Subcaves are related to more content to come in Beta 14 (really content that was supposed to be released alongside them before before this whole exciting UI diversion), and will thus become more relevant then, but even now, being a whole new map it is indeed where a good chunk of the new Beta 13 stuff can be found. Inside you may meet some friends, and some not-so-friends, and probably also some wtf-subsub-you-die-now. Definitely some weird stuff going on in there, more of the background to which will start coming to light with the upcoming Scraptown debut.
Modal UI Layouts
How about those modal UI layouts?! There's actually more to them than just looking at screenshots--you'll want to understand a few related new features as well. Although I've added tutorial messages for the really important stuff, it's worth demonstrating some key points here.
First of all, if you change your UI layout setting in the Options menu, remember you'll need to restart for it to take effect.
On restart, this change also resets your font and calculates a new optimal map size for you, so if you were using an alternative font set you may need to select it again, and some of the styles may be different. Everyone loading up Beta 13 for the first time will automatically find themselves in the Semi-modal layout, our new default.
Aside from the smaller map view, one of the major differences in using these other layouts is that eventually you will be playing with a modal inventory, as in the inventory window is hidden from view, as you can see here in the bottom right:
However, this change doesn't occur until you have evolved enough part slots that the UI space is needed, and there is a lot of QoL to make your modal inventory experience as effortless as possible. For example many actions with even just the potential to require inventory interaction will automatically open and close it for you, such as grabbing a part to drag-dop it with the mouse:
The example above also shows further interactions after manually using the new INVENTORY button, and you can choose to open the inventory and leave it open while doing other things if you like, such as consecutive manipulation of a group of nearby parts. The GIF upload gets kinda messed up a bit at the bottom for some reason, but you can also see that any time an item is added to the inventory, even while it's closed there is a new indicator down there to show the addition.
As usual, using the typewise direct swapping menu is also a convenient way to achieve that goal without opening the inventory at all:
Note: Keyboard players can use the 'i' key to toggle the inventory. How convenient!
In order to keep your inventory visible/non-modal for as long as possible, by default your part category headers will also disappear for a couple floors in the mid-game as you first evolve enough slots to otherwise cause the inventory to hide. They are replaced by bars along the sides to indicate the slots for each of the four categories (which are also labeled by type when empty), and the bars themselves double as the CYCLE buttons specifically for mouse users, as you can see in this demo:
If you end up not liking that feature and would prefer your inventory instead simply disappear earlier, there is an advanced.cfg option to toggle this behavior ("condenseSlotTypeHeaders").
While the Semi-modal layout is called such because you have immediate access to all windows for at least part of a run, as you saw earlier the Modal layout starts with multiple hidden windows. These would be the informational windows that normally appear above the map, and accessing them should be pretty intuitive--it's the same old buttons and keys, and you may not even need to open them much of the time since messages can temporarily appear over the map.
Using the extended log will even give you two columns of log messages:
There are advanced.cfg options if you want to adjust the number of messages, or how long each remains visible.
For lots more demos and related modal UI features, see Part 5 of my Full UI Upscaling series on the dev blog, or to learn all about the design and implementation from start to finish, begin with Part 1 which covers the history and theory before continuing through all the mockups and engine features that made it possible.
Map Zooming
A tutorial and flashing notification will make sure you know about the map zoom if you don't find it yourself, but it's probably fairly obvious with the all-caps ZOOM button staring at you from the top of the map (unless you're a pure keyboard player with the cursor off, in which case that unnecessary button is hidden and you get to use the 'z' key, how convenient!). Holding Shift while using the mouse wheel is another way to zoom, convenient for anyone who happens to be looking around the map via mouse-based Shift-panning.
A quick demo of panning around the map and zooming in and out (this is just in a small window for sharability's sake, mind you--yours will be larger):
Because zooming reduces how far ahead you, the player, can see, you now also have the option to manually designate a new view centerpoint, useful if you're more interested in a particular direction. Mouse users hold the right mouse button to do this, while keyboard players can use 's' ('s'et centerpoint) in examine mode. To restore the centering behavior to normal, just do the same at your own location.
Mouse centerpoint demo:
Keyboard centerpoint demo taking advantage of cursor jumping:
Because doing this via keyboard is somewhat less convenient, in keyboard mode there are also algorithmic approaches that will automatically adjust the centerpoint depending on movement direction and the surroundings, like so:
This behavior normally only applies if zoomed in while using the Non-modal UI layout (which has a larger map to begin with) and there are multiple algorithms to choose from (or deactivate completely, but I've found that once you get used to it the default algorithm can be pretty useful). You can also temporarily set a manual centerpoint to override it. These features and more related options are covered in detail in the manual's new section on "Map Zooming" under "Accessibility."
The other primary drawback to being zoomed in is seeing so much less of the map at once--given a square map view, 2x zoom means you're seeing only a quarter of the normal area you could see before. In a ranged combat environment like Cogmind that was designed with large maps, lots of potential threats, and correspondingly far detection and attack ranges in mind, that means a lot of potentially important info is not in sight at once. Although panning the map, utilizing centerpoints, or occasionally zooming out are useful for proactive management of situational awareness, good QoL can save us quite a lot of time... Bring on the QoL!
Map zoom QoL mainly comes in two categories: markers and responses...
There are offscreen markers for visible robots (here using drones to help expand FOV for demo purposes):
There are offscreen markers for newly-spotted-but-not-yet-labeled items:
There are offscreen markers for sensor data (GIF's not uploading right but you get the idea):
And where it's important, the map view will automatically shift to show offscreen events of importance, like a new threat:
Autoshifting will respond to Watcher reporting, Operator spotting, Heavy active sensor sources, special machine pings... basically the kinds of things you will almost certainly want to see. A lot of this behavior can also be customized via advanced.cfg.
Over on the dev blog I did a whole multipart blog series on map zooming, and in the concluding QoL segment you can see lots more about the above features, plus others, or read back through the entire development process.
Changelog
We still have yet to get to the actual changelog and its many secondary features, which is another of those really long ones I decided would be easier to digest if more finely categorized.
Cogmind Beta 13 "Zoom All The Things" (240227) changelog (excerpt):
Highlights
- NEW: Increased text/tile size by ~33% via 45-row UI layouts, affecting map view area and window modality (new default setting, adjust in Options menu)
- NEW: Zoom the map view, toggling via 'z' key, the <ZOOM> mouse button just above the map, or the scroll wheel while panning the map (Shift)
- NEW: While map zoomed, or if using modal UI layouts, many objects outside view area that would normally be visible are reflected via offscreen markers
- NEW: Branch map "Subcaves"
- NEW: 35 new items (including new mechanics)
- MOD: Optimized audio asset loading reduces game startup time by up to 40% on some systems [Luigi]
- MOD: Optimized rendering increases maximum FPS by 50% or more, especially in tiles mode during heavy movement or animations [Luigi]
- NEW: 18 new encounters
- NEW: 3 new Complex 0b10 map events
- NEW: 3 new derelict robot classes, each with new AI
- NEW: 2 new robot tiles
- NEW: 2 more unique named NPCs
- NEW: 2 new trap types
- NEW: 1 new turret variant
- NEW: Multiple lore entries related to new content
- NEW: Multiple new font sets based on three new typefaces: Tamsyn, Swanston, Cherry
- NEW: Numerous additional font typefaces and variants for higher resolutions based on autoscaled low-resolution options
- NEW: Support for 5K screens (multiple size 48 font sets, or size 64 for modal layouts)
- NEW: <HOSTILES> button just above map view while hostiles in FOV, includes tally and clickability to shift view and highlight enemies
- NEW: While map zoomed, or if using modal UI layouts, if new hostiles to label enter FOV but are currently out of view, view shifts to include them
- NEW: If certain events occur while out of map view (Watcher/Operator/machine ping/etc), view shifts to include them (advanced.cfg: shiftViewForEvents)
- NEW: Hold RMB on map to set custom relative view centerpoint (centering map view focuses on that position instead, including while moving)
- NEW: While in examine mode, press 's' to set custom relative view centerpoint (overrides automated relative view shifting, set on self to reset)
- NEW: While non-modal layout map zoomed in keyboard mode, view centerpoint auto-adjusts to show more in direction of exploration (see manual for options)
- NEW: Hidden modal inventory automatically toggled open during relevant 'p' part management options and modal drop process (keyboard mode)
- NEW: Adding '!' anywhere in item tag forces it to require confirmation to attach
- NEW: Operators preparing to lock Terminal due to IFF handshake failure temporarily flash a marker at their location, or last known location on leaving FOV
- NEW: Mines infestation event includes input block when triggered, to ensure time to respond even when playing fast
- NEW: Long-range pathfinding avoids cave-in areas outside FOV based on location's last known state
- NEW: Option to block all pathfinding through areas with cave-in potential, even if no other route (advanced.cfg: blockCaveinAreasForPathfinding)
- NEW: Optional warning when move might cause a cave-in (advanced.cfg: warnOnCaveinMove)
- NEW: Adding item to a large inventory autosorts by type and scrolls to location in list, momentarily highlighting it
- NEW: Removing item from a large inventory, or other changes to inventory contents, retains scroll state as best possible
- NEW: Modifying specific inventory items highlights and centers on them, for example repairing broken parts, drones returning to inventory bays, etc.
- NEW: Select items with lengthier descriptions may include a More button in their info window that gives access to additional details
- NEW: In modal UI layouts, primary Advanced Commands list split into two pages
- NEW: Option to force message and audio feedback on startup and upon entering -1 if scoresheet uploading is inactive (advanced.cfg: uploadScoresReminder)
- NEW: Option to have map item labels specify size of unidentified items if greater than 1 (advanced.cfg: itemLabelAddUnidentifiedSize)
- NEW: Option to adjust maximum number of lines visible for on-map message log in Modal 45-row UI layout (advanced.cfg: mapMessageLogMaxLength)
- NEW: Option to adjust maximum duration on-map message log messages in Modal 45-row UI layout (advanced.cfg: mapMessageLogDuration)
- MOD: World map fully opens almost instantly instead of tracing route
- MOD: Removed inventory sorting by integrity and mass
- MOD: Map intel mode toggle key changed from 'z' to 'm'
- MOD: Advanced Commands help for parts window no longer lists a number of simple commands already found on Basic commands page
- MOD: Gameover screen once again reports score upload status in real time
- MOD: Updated overall formatting of some font set names
- MOD: Increased timing leniency of various repeat input required to confirm an action, especially with regard to part manipulation
- MOD: Increased accuracy and smoothness of map panning via Shift+mouse
- MOD: Interface feedback messages use different text typing sound than regular message logs (advanced.cfg: muteTextSfx setting applies to this as well)
- MOD: Intel markers in map view that overlap known sensor data blink instead of showing persistently
- MOD: Options menu font set selection menu ordered from largest applicable set to smallest, in windowed mode
- NEW: Salvageable matter may merge with existing free matter when dropped
- NEW: Plasma Cutters reimagined with new abilities
- NEW: Tractor Beam effect includes animation and SFX
- NEW: Repair Stations may release functionality level-appropriate backup parts on taking damage
- NEW: Transport Network Coupler places sabotage intel marker at location of third-party cargo convoy interruption if active at time of report
- NEW: Bonus points for completing transforming item quests
- NEW: Rigged power sources now show their status as RIGGED and provide relevant context help to explain related mechanics
- NEW: Component Analysis Suite explicitly indicates it cannot identify alien technology
- NEW: Shielding utilities' effect data explicitly indicate they cannot protect against overflow damage, as implied in manual
- MOD: Ramming no longer explicitly increases target salvage potential
- MOD: All melee weapon sever crit chances increased by approximately 25% of original value
- MOD: Reduced falloff of all electromagnetic launchers by 1
- MOD: Increased range of all 12-range electromagnetic launchers to 14
- MOD: Guided projectiles using waypoints compare cumulative range against maximum weapon range, rather than absolute range
- MOD: Throwing Claymore stacks reduced in size
- MOD: Multislot propulsion no longer fabs in pairs
- MOD: Sterilization system takes longer to melt objects in maps which start at colder ambient temperature
- MOD: Sterilization system prevents further accumulation of machine destruction value towards score
- MOD: Search patrol responses converted to assault dispatches in extended game area C
- MOD: Newly spawned robots start with full energy reserves instead of base energy amount
- MOD: Some friendly NPCs that go hostile on being attacked are more lenient to allow for an accidental hit
- MOD: Non-0b10 Mechanics/Surgeons or those with explicit AID order use shorter ranges when searching for repair targets
- MOD: Allied Researchers unable to identify more types of non-0b10 tech
- NEW: While combat log detail set to High or above, manually scrolling contents away from bottom automatically opens and scrolls expanded combat log view
- NEW: Combat log inserts "???" where the source of an attack effect is unknown
- NEW: Setting combat log detail to High or above includes victim name when part or core hit or destroyed
- NEW: Setting combat log detail to High or above reports triggered traps, disruptions, projectile penetration, and some critical effects
- NEW: Setting combat log detail to Full reports all critical effects, immediate meltdowns due to thermal transfer, and most terrain destruction
- NEW: Combat log explicitly identifies melee followups, sneak attacks, and Cogmind gunslinging target switches where applicable
- NEW: Programmer hacking attempts/results also reported in combat log
- MOD: CALC window renamed COMBAT
- MOD: Combat log friendly hit/miss messages displayed in shades of white/gray instead of green
- MOD: Multiprojectile weapons merge all projectiles into single combat log entry for hit tally reporting
- MOD: Combat log no longer includes hit part/core coverage/exposure value, regardless of setting
- NEW: Automated saves on map entry in Adventurer/Explorer mode do not occur if more than one-third of your part slots were empty on leaving previous map
- NEW: Updated manual section on "Accessibility" to reflect new layout options and map zooming features
- NEW: Added new combat log features to Advanced UI > Combat Log Window manual section
- NEW: Contextual tutorial message about moves that may cause cave-ins
- NEW: Tutorial message about map zooming feature, and flashing button reminder
- NEW: 23 new scoresheet entries (total = 1,058)
- MOD: user/meta.bin file renamed progress.bin
- MOD: Leaderboards display different locations based on win type rather than "Ascended"
- NEW: Fatal error screen gives full details of internal error message, as found in run.log
- FIX: New crash as of Beta 12 while animating one of the rarer ending sequences [MTF]
- FIX: [RPGLIKE mode] New Beta 12 caves encounter crashed map on first turn after entry [Infomantis]
So that's, uh, part of the changelog. The full thing is more than twice as long, a bit excessive to include here, so the less important bits were relegated to a separate extended changelog which as usual you can find packaged with the game or online here.
Saves from earlier versions are incompatible with Beta 13, but even if you're on Steam and Cogmind automatically updates, Beta 12 is still available via its own legacy branch and you can roll back to finish a run in progress first if you like.
Combat Log
For Beta 13 the combat log has been significantly expanded, including almost every possible detail when set to the highest level. Patrons have consistently put lots of votes towards seeing this happen, and while it never quite topped the list, that consistency and a contingent of really persistent optimization-loving fans convinced me it was about time to do it. If you like logs, drop by Discord and thank those folks :)
Simply scrolling the combat log also opens a full-height version that's easier to read if you want to examine a greater number of attacks/turns:
For a range of visual samples and explanations of what you can find in the new combat log, see SITREP #51.
One sample you won't find there (because it was just added recently) is a new explicit indicator for when the source of an attack is unknown:
More!
You may notice that Cogmind Beta 13 starts up more quickly. Of course it's not exactly instantaneous--there's a lot of resources to prepare and the game loads most things it could possibly need right from the start. Definitely faster, though, by up to 40%!
This is actually the doing of Luigi, one of Cogmind's biggest supporters over the years, so a big round of applause to Luigi for his work with the open source libraries my engine depends on. And it doesn't stop there! Luigi has also contributed optimizations to SDL itself, improving Cogmind's rendering performance by 50% or more.
These are some insane numbers.
Luigi you're amazing.
(Part of Luigi's impetus here was to get Cogmind running smoothly on the latest Apple hardware--he is also the creator of mods to make that possible, instructions and links for which are available here, if interested.)
So you're still here, eh?
I guess let's round off this announcement with a collection of random stuff from the changelog I happened to record along the way :)
You'll find a few items now have a [M]ore button, generally avoided and not needed, but in a handful of cases where we have a weapon (which already mostly fill their stats page to begin with) that also possesses a more involved special ability we need some extra room for the description. (This button may apply either to an item's Effect section or description at the bottom.)
The world map was rebuilt to animate instantly on being opened rather than tracing your route!
The Plasma Cutter has a completely different use now, instead for safely cutting up explosive machines, or making it through almost any blast door given enough time.
I discovered that simulated debris from destruction out of sight and not nearby you was only working in ASCII mode, not tiles, leading to somewhat cleaner environments in the latter case even where a previous battle took place. Here's a comparison before and after the fix, showing what a room looks like after a battle between some derelicts and 0b10 forces also destroyed a nearby machine:
Obviously if there happen to be any Workers nearby they'll clean it up anyway, but still, it should be there until then! (or it's a map with no Serfs, or they're all far away or whatever)
Mass and Integrity sorting were removed from the inventory window, leaving only type sorting (forward and reverse), so that button looks different now as well:
This was to regain the keys m/i for easy keyboard access to zooming (after also moving the original 'z' intel to 'm'ap intel) and modal inventory, our new UI features. Most people purely rely on type sort anyway, the largest inventories have shrunk since Beta 11, and the mass/integrity info can be relatively easily obtained and parsed by switching to the appropriate visualization mode anyway.
Your inventory will now maintain the same scroll position during manipulation, such as dropping parts, allowing more rapid dropping in succession:
And adding a new item to your inventory automatically sorts the list, scrolls to the new item's position, and highlights it for a moment:
(The original behavior was to always scroll to the end of your inventory list and put it there.)
The leaderboards now more explicitly indicate the location of each win (as originally reflected in the scoresheet) instead of showing all wins as simply "Ascended."
Once your score is uploaded (if you have opted in), the game over screen will also show the leaderboards URL for those who may not be aware of it. (As usual the full scoresheet still includes direct URLs to your online scoresheet data as well, at the end.)
Guided projectiles are finally capable of checking their cumulative travel distance against the weapon range, rather than using absolute range from the firing origin, so you'll be a little more limited in what weird stuff you can do with these types of weapons nearby your position, assuming you had enough waypoints :P
While using Refit at a Repair Station is usually going to be an easier option if that's your goal, in the interest of fun environmental interactions, destroyed Repair Stations may now randomly spill some of their backup parts:
Matter salvage is now capable of merging when it drops! See how this Recycler's destruction simply grows the original matter pile below it:
Similarly, matter spilled on top of a collection of parts and matter will sometimes attempt to instead combine with nearby existing matter. Across larger battlefields this can result in somewhat more concentrated matter and a little extra room for salvageable components that might otherwise be pushed further away, or crushed outright due to floor space being taken up by excessive matter. This had became somewhat more common given the newer ability of kinetic cannon strikes to blast usable matter off targets (even though that effect was already capable of matter merging).
Speaking of matter, Tractor Beams also now come with an animation and sound effect as they do their sucking (sorry for the smaller recording, a lot of these were done in my test environment just to have a record :P):
Many of the new items I described or alluded to in the months before embarking on the UI Quest are completed and still waiting on the sidelines for Beta 14, but the Subcaves and new bots and encounters already added in Beta 13 do of course include a decent chunk of them--35 new items in all, so nothing to sneeze at. More than half of these are pretty special, just a taste of the increasingly unique items and build possibilities to come.
Beta... 14?
About that Beta 14, I hope to release it sooner rather than later. This will not be the same kind of wait as seen for the previous releases, in part because a decent chunk of its content is complete, and in part because I did split up the Scraptown expansion into multiple separate versions to keep them more reasonable. If you recall from my Year 10 of the Cogmind annual review, we've already got general plans out to Beta 17, and I hope that each of these releases won't be quite so huge so they can be delivered in a more timely manner.
Due to reorienting this version towards new interface options, some other features I've previously mentioned as slated for Beta 13, like updated movement behavior for large robot AI, have been moved back to Beta 14. This also includes the Scrap Engine's proper location, so that can still be found simply lying on the ground at the entrance to Recycling for now :P
Thank you for your support, currently no plans for 1.0, just more free expansions (10th different ending coming up!), hope you enjoy the new UI layouts and other features, leave reviews :)
62
Announcements / SITREP Saturday #55: Upscaled Modal Interface
« on: February 23, 2024, 05:12:32 PM »
Early this month I introduced Cogmind's first new upscaled layout option, then immediately followed up with development of our second new option! While the other option (to become the new player default) is "Semi-modal," we'll now have a third and even more extreme "Modal" layout which, as you can see in the sample above, hides away the top-side consoles in order to reclaim more of the map view.
That sample screenshot happens to be taken with optional map zoom activated as well--although I think the upscaled grid size across the board means modal layout players are less likely to need or want to zoom the map, the function is of course available and the new zoom-related QoL will come in especially useful.
With the top-side consoles hidden, message/combat logs can be opened and read in full as usual, but for convenience they'll also show temporarily over the map (adjustable count and duration), as seen here with two columns of message log data:
A mix of message log (left) and combat log (right):
Above the map are the familiar buttons for interacting with what is normally visible in those consoles:
See below for some additional sample screenshots from the Modal UI layout (open images to full size if necessary).
Early game (zoomed, 1080p):
Late game (not zoomed, 1080p):
The same scene as above, but in 1440p and using one of several new fonts added to Beta 13 (Tamsyn):
If you want to see the Modal layout in action, earlier this week I streamed a run making use of it, actually the conclusion to my last stream that began with the other/Semi-modal layout:
All three UI layout options are available right from the top of the Options menu (requires a restart to take effect):
More information, as well as a summary of the Semi-modal layout, can be found on the dev blog in Part 5 of the the "Full UI Upscaling" series, "Completion and Demos."
-
If you're itching to try these new layouts yourself, the good news is... they're coming next week! The results of testing have been very positive, and Beta 13 release is now scheduled for February 27th :D
63
General Discussion / Re: I wish the grids with a map comment are more conspicuous
« on: February 20, 2024, 07:46:39 PM »
Yeah it was intentionally set a little lower by default to avoid being annoying, since that's a core tenet of the design, to keep the map as static and low-distraction as possible, but depending on how much you rely on comments, and what for, lowering that value to make them really noticeable could be desirable and helpful--make them as annoying as you want 
64
General Discussion / Re: I wish the grids with a map comment are more conspicuous
« on: February 20, 2024, 07:12:43 PM »
The configuration feature already exists, it was introduced together with map comments when they were first added to the game, and is described in the manual under Map Comments.
You can set your interval (or turn it off) via mapCommentHighlightInterval.
Not planning to add another key for it though, you'll have to enter comment mode for that.
You can set your interval (or turn it off) via mapCommentHighlightInterval.
Not planning to add another key for it though, you'll have to enter comment mode for that.
65
Announcements / SITREP Saturday #54: Map Zoom QoL
« on: February 16, 2024, 04:13:17 PM »
I recently finished my Adventures in Map Zooming series over on the dev blog, and the most recent and final part covers what is from a player perspective the most important zooming-related topic: QoL!
You can read the full article for every detail, but this being a set of vital new features I figure it's worth providing a quick summary here in announcement form as well.
Before we get to that, another important notice: Since last week's introduction of a new fully-upscaled UI layout, I also had the opportunity to stream that layout and demonstrate it in action while talking about its various features:
Work on modal layouts has continued this week, including the addition of our third even more modal variant I know some you have been looking forward to as well. Yep, the "Phase 4" UI is already on the way... I'll be featuring that one in my next stream.
Movement QoL
Spinning the mouse wheel is normally a convenient way to wait for turns to pass, and we wouldn't want to take that away, but many folks are already using the mouse to pan the map view around while holding Shift, and Shift-Wheel is not taken, so provides us a natural alternative for toggling zoom state rather than always requiring usage of the ZOOM button or 'z' key.
That’s low-hanging fruit, though. We’re going to need much more powerful QoL...
Beginning in Beta 13, you'll be able to manually adjust the map centerpoint to keep more focused in a particular direction of interest (important while zoomed in because the visible map area is smaller):
Non-mouse players can similarly set a manual centerpoint via keyboard, which is still fairly fast if you're familiar with jumping the examine cursor:
Keyboard players can also take advantage of several types of algorithms for automatically adjusting their centerpoint while zoomed, trying to shift the view without any manual input in order to keep interesting features visible (it seems weird and takes some getting used to, but at least in the non-modal UI layout it works as a pretty nice supplementary feature):
Offscreen Object QoL
Once you’re zoomed in on only a quarter of the normal map area, it’s literally impossible to always see everything you might need to see in every situation. We need new indicators for important objects outside the current map view, especially those which are still within FOV (and probably even attack range!).
While manually panning the map or designating a centerpoint to keep an eye on a particular direction is useful, and temporarily zooming out to get a general idea of the surroundings is another option, to save time there are a variety of new markers that can appear at the edges of the map view to denote objects in that direction. You’ll see markers for offscreen hostiles, non-hostiles (both neutral and friendly), new items, and sensor data. Each marker category uses its own unique background color, and in the case of sensor data is also darker and blinks in and out to reflect the fact that it is not a directly visible object like the others. Items are only marked until automatically labeled for the first time after entering view.
A demo of flashing offscreen zoom markers for visible robots (I have some drones out here to help demonstrate):
Threats appear on a dark red background, while non-hostile robots use dark-green. As usual, the colors used are different if colorblind mode is active.
Flashing offscreen zoom markers for new items, which use a dark gray background:
Dark offscreen sensor data markers with a low-frequency blink out effect:
Indicators are great, but still not quite enough. After all, what do you generally want to do when a new threat comes into view? A quick visual check! What exactly are they, what’s their status, do they have company, what’s the surrounding environment like... These can be important questions to answer before making your next decision, and by default Cogmind already pauses for a moment in these situations in order to let the player have a moment to take it in (and avoid accidentally wasting valuable turns), so why not also use that opportunity to automatically shift the view over to spot the threat?
Automatically shifting the view a bit more to the left as soon as a Sentry is spotted down at the end of a corridor:
Another autoshifting example, in this case simultaneously spotting enemies down two different corridors and shifting to put them all in view:
The full article has other samples, such as shifting the map view to highlight a Watcher reporting a threat to nearby allies, or entering a Heavy's potential sensor range. Automated shifting can also be applied to useful situations such as machine pings (RIF Installer discovery, Zion Terminals...).
whether zoomed or not, another new feature that became more desirable with the advent of zooming is the new HOSTILES button that can appear above the map. This serves as a reminder that there are enemies in view, and is also clickable to center on said enemies (or back on oneself):
There you have it, anyone planning to stick with the original 60-row UI layout and combining that with map zooming will likely be making heavy use of many of these features, which will also come in handy even when not zoomed in if using a new modal layout.
Progress has been so good that unless there are too many unexpected discoveries during ongoing testing, Beta 13 might just release a lot sooner than later... this month even? (I do hope that we can get some more reviews going--been a slow... years in that regard :P)
Again I'll soon be streaming further playtesting of the modal layouts, including the newest one I have yet to properly introduce. Sharing that will probably be a good opportunity to finish my other run, the melee-crab-turned-flier :)
Aside: While there's no Community section to today's announcement, I feel it's worth pointing to a recent masterpiece by u/dogawesome. They've been posting a lot of memes to r/Cogmind lately, and recently concluded with a video meme compilation that summarizes a lot of Cogmind experiences in a pretty funny way. While one could say it contains a lot of spoiler references, they're almost all so esoteric and indicated by acronyms such that you only know if you know, so maybe not really that spoilery after all. In any case, consider checking it out here for some laughs :)
66
General Discussion / Re: I am pretty sure there must be some algorithm behind this evil setup....
« on: February 11, 2024, 05:40:15 PM »
Ah well actually yeah there are definitely some restrictions as far as placement goes, but other than that it's quite random, so they won't be right near your entrance, that's true (unless it's a special prefab or something, but we're talking random traps here).
I wasn't clear enough in that what I meant was they're not in this particular instance blocking the only path out of that part of the map. Their location is appropriately distant from your start though, yeah, as intended
But also as stated, theoretically though you could in fact be blocked in an area by one or more fully trapped corridors, they just won't be right nearby.
I wasn't clear enough in that what I meant was they're not in this particular instance blocking the only path out of that part of the map. Their location is appropriately distant from your start though, yeah, as intended
But also as stated, theoretically though you could in fact be blocked in an area by one or more fully trapped corridors, they just won't be right nearby.
67
General Discussion / Re: I am pretty sure there must be some algorithm behind this evil setup....
« on: February 10, 2024, 10:08:12 PM »
Ha, I think truly evil would be if they were stretched across your only entry point, as opposed to here having multiple alternative routes available there! But it is actually random so the former could indeed occur as well. Plenty of traps out there, so generate enough maps and some of them will have more brutal areas
Always be prepared! Or prepared to face the consequences... (Actually specifically for chute traps some people will identify the nearest threats in advance through whatever means they can, if worried about one, like jacking a Worker.)
Always be prepared! Or prepared to face the consequences... (Actually specifically for chute traps some people will identify the nearest threats in advance through whatever means they can, if worried about one, like jacking a Worker.)
68
Everything REXPaint / Re: .gpl File type Support.
« on: February 10, 2024, 04:39:13 PM »
Oh cool, thanks for the indirect feature support in that case
69
Ideas / Re: Would smoke grenades be a good idea for Cogmind?
« on: February 07, 2024, 11:56:17 PM »
Hell yeah, lotta cool new items coming down the pipe! Just need to finish this UI interlude first so I can get back to that stuff...
70
Ideas / Re: Would smoke grenades be a good idea for Cogmind?
« on: February 07, 2024, 06:54:56 PM »
Ah, the perennial question (okay it's not all that common, but it does come up every couple years or so). This was discussed here in 2015 among related topics, and it's still the same philosophy, so nope, no smoke (or any such effect).
We do have some similar effects through parts, however, like cloaking for example, or the new upcoming ID Mask.
We do have some similar effects through parts, however, like cloaking for example, or the new upcoming ID Mask.
71
Announcements / SITREP Saturday #53: Full UI Upscaling
« on: February 02, 2024, 05:09:00 PM »
With map zooming and lots of other work already complete and ready for the upcoming Beta 13 release, early last month I began building the optional new UI layout to make everything larger! I first shared the specifications last year, and more recently have been writing about them as relevant architectural work got underway in earnest.
That series began with the new year, where you can read in Part 1 about the history and theory behind Cogmind's UI layout, where it's been and where it's going.
The current layout will continue to exist as an option, generally being the most efficient way to play, but we'll be getting a new default layout that increases the size of everything across the board by 33%. In other words, for example those of you using size 18 fonts and tiles (the majority of players), will instead be using size 24 under the new layout.
Here is a sample screenshot of the 1080p 45-row terminal layout:
And the intro image at the opening of this post can be opened to full size for a side-by-side comparison of the 1080p resolution appearance before and after the changes.
More on this project further below, but first...
Map Zooming COMPLETE
First of all a quick update for those who might be interested in the separate map zooming feature and haven't been following the blog: it is now fully implemented and works great. (This is different from the UI upscaling, which applies to the entire interface--the map can be further zoomed in addition to that.) I've documented the work behind that process in a series of articles on the blog--lots of engine work, testing, and new feature development.
The coolest part is all the related QoL that helps mitigate the drawbacks of a zoomed map view so that it's actually decently playable, which I'll be sharing in more detail later this month (the blog is kinda overflowing with content lately :P). I already demoed a lot of it in that earlier video, but it wasn't a concentrated demo, and when that info comes out in article form you'll be able to browse all the features more easily, with many samples.
However, what I'm actually working on now could in many cases make it so that you will not even need or want to to zoom the map :)
Full UI Upscaling
A couple times before, including most recently as part of my Year 10 of the Cogmind update, I shared this diagram (to scale) of my UI layout plans:
To summarize, Phase 2 is complete, and I've been making very good progress on Phase 3. As I work on it, I'm also starting to lean towards going all the way to Phase 4 with this right now, if only because it will probably be more playable overall than Phase 3, though doing so will of course take longer. It's going to happen eventually, so may as well do it now while the UI iron is hot, yeah?
Phase 1/3/4 would each represent different UI options, with Phase 2 work representing map zooming, a feature technically available regardless of layout.
If you'd like to read more about the implementation details, I've been sharing it across several articles so far:
Full UI Upscaling, Part 1: History and Theory: Background and summary of the intent and plans behind building Cogmind's fully upscaled semi-modal interface layout.
Full UI Upscaling, Part 2: Holy Mockups!: Revisiting many of Cogmind's windows to make adjustments enabling everything to fit into fewer rows for the semi-modal UI layout.
Full UI Upscaling, Part 3: Dynamic Terminal Swapping: Figuring out how to get Cogmind's many 60-row ending animations to play nicely with a 45-row terminal layout.
There's no specific timeline for completion of this project (I don't want to offer up any dates because my preference is to prioritize the addition of even more unexpected features when opportunities present themselves rather than striving to hit particular deadlines), but I will say that I hope to get this out there as soon as possible since it's already delayed what I was originally working on (the expansion proper), not to mention the last Beta release was a while ago. Unfortunately the sheer scope of this UI project has had a lot of architectural repercussions, requiring a lengthy testing process to ensure the stability and quality Cogmind is known for, as well as eventual knock-on effects like requiring me to finally redo a significant portion of Cogmind's media screenshots and info prior its release.
Anyway, quite an undertaking, and I really look forward to getting back to the Scraptown/UFD expansion when this is done some time in the next couple months. Oops, I said a date.
In the meantime, more info will be coming to the blog and elsewhere, as usual :)
Upscaled UI Demos
That's not all! You want details! I haven't recorded absolutely all the new stuff in action, but below you can see some highlights. The first 1080p screenshot I shared above was before the inventory becomes modal, which doesn't occur until you've evolved enough slots to need that space for your parts list (this isn't generally until you reach -5/Factory). Here's another scene after the inventory has switched to its modal form, accessed via that button down there at the bottom:
(All of the following images were recorded using a 1080p interface, so open them to see at their true size if necessary, and of course if you actually play using a resolution even greater than that, everything will be scaled up accordingly in use, as usual.)
Once modal, adding an item to your inventory, whether from the ground or detaching it, has a new indicator to show it went there:
Drag-dropping works normally, and you can even drag attached parts directly onto the inventory button to send them there without opening it:
We have related QoL, like situations where the inventory is automatically opened and closed for you, for example when using corresponding relevant functions of the modal 'p' part management menu:
In the above example, hitting 'p' to activate the part management menu, then 'a' for attach, automatically opens the inventory, from which '2' is selected for the Transmission Jammer, attaching it then automatically closing the inventory again. For other keyboard input options, besides toggling the inventory with 'i', simply using any key for inventory sorting or scrolling will also automatically open it.
Of course the regular old swap menu also works just fine, even when the inventory is modal, meaning opening the inventory is often not even necessary:
The inventory-first keyboard swap system has also been modified to remain compatible with a modal inventory, with automated opening/closing if necessary:
Once you've evolved enough slots, in order to keep the inventory visible for as long as possible the parts headers will also be removed to condense the list into a new format. The sidebars are clickable just like the regular CYCLE buttons, so that mouse users can retain access to that functionality if they need it:
Secondary UI windows that were in most cases designed for at least 50 rows (and to fit in the map view area, like when hacking machines), now occupy the entire height of the program, and were adjusted to fit into 45 rows as necessary. Like for items the best solution was to move their art off to the side:
Likewise, item searching has to cover the entire HUD, as well as reduce its help text area, but there's still enough room down there to show the essentials (huh, Imgur seems to have messed up the final frame of this gif xD):
The added height pressure meant that in a handful of rare cases it might be possible for robot info to not fit in 45 rows, though in all such cases the info fits if we apply the "More" button to resistances (functionality originally added to support longer descriptions for items in Beta 13):
Multiple changes were required across the content of game menu pages, which in most cases turned out as described in the earlier mockups I shared. Here's a demo of the new basic commands/button layout, and two-page access to advanced commands:
All three types of collection UIs (gallery/lore/achievements) were reworked specifically for this layout, for example achievements:
Although in the new layout those windows occupy the entire screen, they don't normally extend to all edges in the full/original layout, nor do the supporter/patron lists do so in any layout, so I've finally taken the opportunity to rework the archirtecture such that the background can be darkened while these modal windows are open (something I've wanted to do for years):
As with other secondary windows, in this layout the world map view also occupies the entire program height, and was somewhat condensed in order to fit within the limitations, but the good news (for everyone!) is that I also took this opportunity to do something else that I've wanted to do for years: speed it up. Although I started with this fun vision of a map animating the route you took to get where you are, while not too problematic in Cogmind's early years, the continued addition of new areas and potential for lengthier routes could make it a bit of a slot to view the full map in the late game, so I've rebuilt it to appear in its entirety almost instantly :D
As described in Part 3 of my series on terminal swapping, here's a demo of the new 45-row layout temporarily switching to 60 rows for the end game sequence and final screen (which would include any win animations)--the corresponding font goes from size 16 Terminus to size 12 Terminus, which I've recorded in a 720p window (though of course further shrunk here for display--open for full size):
This new "semi-modal" layout for Cogmind will likely become the new default, and can be changed in the options menu (though taking effect requires a restart):
There's a good chance that I'll be taking this development all the way to "Phase 4" right away, the even more modal layout hiding the top-side consoles as well in order to restore much more of the map view. That would become a third optional setting.
Stream
If you want to check out these features live, and ask questions, listen to dev talk, or just hang out with other players, I'll be playtesting this layout on stream next Monday (Feb. 5) starting around 7:30 PM EST for likely a few hours.
After that you'll be able to find it archived here.
UPDATE 240205: I was about to stream at the announced time today and suddenly discovered that I'm locked out of my Twitch account for about the next week xD
I tried to see if it could be resolved quickly, but no go. And I was all ready to do that stream, too :/
I'll have to reschedule the demo stream, maybe for the same time next week, but we'll see (it'll be announced separately in the forums and elsewhere...).
UPDATE 240212: Alright, as of now I'm back into my account and will schedule this upscaled stream for the same time this week, so in about 12 hours: Monday (Feb. 12) starting around 7:30 PM EST!
The results of the stream are now archived here:
Wiki Replaced
Wiki links now instead to lead to this new front page with lots of links to useful information, including a separate community wiki database and tools that people have been redirected to for a while now anyway:
Beta 13 is on the way! Probably won't be more than one SITREP before then, if any, though I may put one out to highlight some of the map zooming QoL, just to once again drive home what's coming so that folks are aware :D. Oh right, Phase 4 would likely be something worth sharing in advance as well... I'm super curious what ratio of players will end up wanting to use the new layout(s), and will be eager to examine and share those stats with you all when the time comes.
72
Ideas / Re: [QoL] Request of advanced options for item labels
« on: January 31, 2024, 07:00:08 AM »
Caught me at just the right time, I guess, since I was just about to start handling a few minor things to warm up, and this would fit right in so rather than throwing it on the TODO list I decided to just go for it.
73
Ideas / Re: [QoL] Request of advanced options for item labels
« on: January 31, 2024, 02:00:33 AM »
There ya go:
74
Ideas / Re: [QoL] Request of advanced options for item labels
« on: January 31, 2024, 01:23:16 AM »
Interestingly, even as an experienced player, I wouldn't want to turn off label ratings myself, since I'm using labels rather than tiles to determine how valuable something is, and don't want to immediately read all the actual label text on first pass. (Examining tiles isn't as fast or reliable since labels can cover them if you're looking at a lot of labels.)
Anyway, everyone has their own preferences, hence why they exist
Anyway, everyone has their own preferences, hence why they exist
75
Ideas / Re: [QoL] Request of advanced options for item labels
« on: January 31, 2024, 01:16:53 AM »
Those could be some good options, sure
Expect them in Beta 13!
Expect them in Beta 13!